2013 Landmark Conference Volleyball Championship

Top six seeds qualify for postseason

Play-In Match: Oct. 27, 2013 (at highest seed)
No. 7 USMMA at No. 6 Goucher GOU 3-0
Box Score
Recap
       
First Round: Nov. 5, 2013 (at highest seeds)
No. 6 Goucher at No. 3 Catholic CUA 3-0
Box Score Recap
No. 5 Moravian at No. 4 Scranton SCR 3-1
Box Score Recap
       
Semifinals: Nov. 8, 2013 (at Juniata)
No. 4 Scranton at No. 1 Juniata JUN 3-1
Box Score Recap
No. 3 Catholic vs. No. 2 Susquehanna SUS 3-0
Box Score Recap
       
Championship: Nov. 9, 2013 (at Juniata)
No. 2 Susquehanna at No. 1 Juniata
JUN 3-1
Box Score
Recap

 

2013 Landmark Conference Volleyball Champions
Juniata College

 

Landmark Volleyball Championship History
2012 Juniata
2011 Juniata
2010 Juniata
2009 Juniata
2008 Juniata
2007 Juniata

 


Tiebreaking Procedures

In the event two (or more) teams tie in the conference standings, the following procedure shall be used to determine seeding for the championship:

1. Head-to-head record amongst all tied teams in contests that count toward the conference standings
2. Comparison of tied teams’ records against remaining teams in conference standings in descending order (starting at No. 1)
3. Comparison of percentage of games won amongst tied teams
4. Comparison of percentage of points won amongst tied teams
5. Away winning percentage in conference matches (only if all tied teams played the same number of away matches)
6. Head-to-head record amongst all tied teams in all contests (only if all tied teams played one another in the same amount of contests)
7. Head-to-head record against common non-conference opponents at same site
8. Head-to-head record against common non-conference opponents at different site
9. Coin flip (or similar random action)

Application of Tie-Breaking Procedure
In a tie of more than two teams, tie-breakers shall be applied in descending order until a team or a group of teams have gained an advantage and the initial tie has been broken. Teams shall be seeded accordingly based upon where they rank within the group of tied teams. If a sub-group (or groups) of tied teams are created by applying tie-breaking criteria to the original group, the tie-breaking process begins anew for the sub-group (or groups) until all teams can be seeded.

In a tie of more than two teams, when a random action is used to break the tie, the tie-breaking process shall begin anew starting with the first criteria (head-to-head) once one team has gained the advantage.

In the event of multiple ties in the standings, the ties will be broken in descending order, unless a lower seeded tie can be broken by using the first criteria (head-to-head). When comparing tied teams against positions lower in the standings which are also tied, those “lower tied positions” shall be considered as a “single position” for purposes of comparison, unless those “lower tied positions” were broken through head-to-head comparison.

If two or more groups of teams are tied, the seeding for one group of tied teams, even if determined by a random action, shall be considered for tie-breaking purposes for any remaining groups.